Flora

I thought I would share a photo of Missouri’s colorful flora. Yes, you never know what exotic bloom you’ll come upon when out walking in these hills.

Colorful Missouri Flora

This silk floral lei was hanging from a tree in the middle of the forest that surrounds the Illinois end of the the Chain or Rocks Bridge. For ‘junk’ it was surprisingly pretty and fit the lush green of a typical Missouri marsh in summer. Artful grafitti. That’s the surprising thing about Chain of Rocks — not that there isn’t graffiti, but that the graffiti is rather attractive, and somehow appropriate.

I discovered the lei when I went with my roommate early yesterday morning to the Chain of Rocks: me to walk the Bridge, him to take his new bike on the bike path that follows the Mississippi until downtown. We picked morning since with the summer comes the summer heat and humidity.

Yesterday was only a start on the festivities I’ll attend this week. Missouri has come alive with a rich tapestry of interesting, and free, events. Tomorrow my daily outing will be the St. Louis Zoo, to see the king penguin baby and the new Fragile Forest exhibit. Also tomorrow, the first of the weekly concert series at the Botanical Gardens; Friday brings the first of the musical evenings at the zoo. Forest Park features the Shakespeare play, The Tempest, in the wonderful outdoor amphitheater. Next week brings the finest ragtime festival in the world to Sedalia, Missouri. All nice breaks from the web page design, coding, and writing.

Not that I don’t spend a lot of time regardless with the latter. We finished Loren’s Wordform conversion this weekend, and I really do like the look of his site. The “Floating Clouds” design takes on new meaning with his sky blue photographs and use of transparent sidebar. I wish I could take credit for these design additions, but Loren decided on both, and it really works for his site and the overall layout and concept.

We also broke the “800×600″ barrier with his site — the center columns combine to 900 pixels. It was that or shrink Loren’s photos, and I’m not sure that the need to ‘rigidly’ follow this standard outweighs the effect of this shrinkage. If a person has an 800×600 monitor, they will need to scroll past the sidebar somewhat to get to Loren’s writing, but all of the content column will fit in the viewer, and I think this is the critical element. Hard to say, because I’m perceiving the design from monitors supporting 1024, or higher, resolution.

Closeup

Speaking of perceptions. I, like some others, also listened to the Chris Lydon OpenSource radio program last night. I wasn’t even aware of it until people started mentioning it yesterday, and then I had to catch the ‘last showing’ in Seattle at 9pm (11pm my time).

From a radio perspective, I thought there was too many interruptions in the show — phone numbers to call, station breaks, notes about sponsors. I don’t listen to much talk radio so perhaps this is normal.

The guests were David Weinberger, Dave Winer, and Doc Searls. As has been noted already elsewhere, this may not have been the best of choices for a show on Web 2.0–not that the people aren’t involved in it; but that this group has decidely focused viewpoints that don’t necessarily reflect that of the general populace.

For instance, a person named Catherine called into the show and noted that the internet fosters communication but in a sterile manner. This was mild criticism, but the guys didn’t necessarily address it so much as they tried to bury it with their enthusiasm. This seems to be all too common: critical debate has a very fragile existence in weblogging conversations. Discussions are either love fests or flame wars; there is very little in-between.

Intake Towers

I also have one minor correction to make about what was discussed: Doc Searls and David Weinberger both mentioned how open source is owned by everyone and can be worked on by anyone, but that’s not entirely true. Open source is like proprietary source in that there are always those who control the direction and modifications of a specific piece of software–it’s just with open source, those who disagree with this direction can make a choice to start in a different direction, spun off from the main.

This is important to keep in mind because one misinformed criticism leveled at open source is that it is ‘too chaotic’–an assertion recently made as a reason not to release Java, as open source.

(Now what this has to do with Chris Lydon’s radio broadcast, leading to the title “OpenSource”, I have no idea.)

But I digress. David mentioned that he spent the weekend in a place with little internet access, and how cut off he felt by it. Lydon responded with the question: Is David addicted?

Riding over Drugs

Dave Winer made a statement in reply to another caller (Ruth) that jarred badly. In response to her observation about the use of the internet by people in Vietnam and her wonder how they’re using it, he jumped in with a quip that people in Vietnam are online primarily looking for sex. He said this also applies to LiveJournalers. He may have been semi-joking, but it showed little respect for the caller, and her comments. It was a glib, offhand response that added little to the discussion.

This statement aside, if there is one thing that would have given the show more grit, it would have been to include a more diverse group of interviewees. This particular group shares many of the same enthusiasms; without critical feedback, the show puffed a little overly much, becoming more of a pep rally than a true discussion of Web 2.0. This did, however, lead to the funniest part of the broadcast: after a particularly exuberant set of statements about how the web is going to change the world, a station break mentioned that the show, Living on Earth, would follow.

My biggest surprise of the evening was how nice Doc Searl’s voice is. I don’t think I’d ever heard it before, but he has a lovely voice. However, my perceptions may be a little biased because of something Doc said that was one of the most honest if quiet assertions in the entire program. When David Weinberger brought up how the weblogging environment still reflects the early dominance by Americans, and not just any Americans, but geeky Americans, Doc interjected, ‘…and males’.

For that, Doc earned a rose.

Classic Red

This entry was posted in Society. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Flora

  1. McD says:

    I listened to a segment of this show via a podcast from Dave Winer’s site. For the premier show Chris went to his list of contacts from his time at Berkman,
    I think. The “Gilmore Gang” podcast has similar issues in terms of a narrow point of view… the echo chamber effect: 4 voices from a very similar perspective led by a person that continues to use the same sources for input.

    The only real conflict of views I’ve heard yet was a
    debate/forum created by Denese Howell featuring Cory Doctorow, Robert Scoble and an EFF lawyer talking about the issues involved with Google’s Toobar. Cory Doctorow was brilliant, inciteful and thoroughly
    vicious (IMHO) in his treatment of Scoble but THAT was great audio. This Chris Lydon show needs an injection of disagreement (can he handle conflict or would he prefer the lovefest)… I’d love to hear YOU and Dave Winer discuss gender bias in the blog-o-sphere. That would be engaging… Someone
    needs to suggest that Chris do a show on women in the blog-o-sphere and get you, Jeanne and Halley
    on the air… you know “round up the posse” and
    make it happen.

  2. Doug says:

    I love McD’s neologism: “inciteful”.

  3. Shelley says:

    McD, Jeneane, Halley, and I don’t always agree, so am assuming you meant a discussion among us, not as one side of a debate.

    As for Mr. Winer and I having a debate, radio show or not, highly unlikely to happen. And I’m not sure whether it would serve a purpose. As part of a larger group, it could be interesting. Perhaps I’ll suggest this to Mr. Lydon as a follow up show:

    “Where are the women 2.0″

  4. loren says:

    I’ve learned to avoid these conversations in general, Shelley, but, please, let us not encourage people to add “artful graffiti” to what little is left of nature, no matter how colorful it might be.

  5. Shelley says:

    Loren, I’m not sure what you meant by these types of discussions, but I’m not encouraging this behavior — just noting that in this instance, it was pretty. As has been the unusual painted graffiti on the Bridge itself (before it was reclaimed as a park).

    As it was, I would have removed the lei if I could have reached it.

  6. loren says:

    By “these kinds of discussions” I was simply referring to discussions of A-listers and those who present themselves as A-listers, Shelley, particularly when it involves their self-promotion.

  7. Somewhat contra my deep skepticism, I think it’s important to judge what Chris Lydon is doing keeping in mind the imperatives of a debut show. I don’t begrudge him any deliberation construction of the guest list to be predicable promoters here. If he decides to invite Huey, Dewey, and Louie, and play Donald Duck himself, well, it’s not surprising to end up at Disneyworld. But that’s just ducky.