Free Link
Well, since love is out ("all you need is love..."), I guess I'll have to focus on links, instead.
Speaking of links, in a posting earlier this week, I didn't link to the webloggers that I referenced, and I noticed that AKMA did that in some recent postings, as did Mike Golby. A big benefit from all of this is that the writing flows so much more nicely without all the underlines or bolded or contrasting color text.
Seems to me that when referencing a weblogger in a generic sense, just using the person's tag line or name (or however they're addressed in the blogroll), should be enough. If addressing a specific post, then it makes sense to link to that posting.
Yeah, this isn't the war on Iraq or a writing of great beauty, but damn, that's all I have at the moment.
(I guess I'll have to alpha my list if I do this. Sigh.)
All you need is links, all you need is links,
All you need is links, links, links is all you need.
Links, links, links, links, links, links, links, links, links
Posted by Bb at August 21, 2002 10:43 PM
Oh, I see. This morning I composed the posts, figuring I'd go back and link 'em when I was done writing--but then I forgot to go back. That really was bad form on my part, since those pasts are part of an extended argument (they would be missed by a Threadneedle--what? "Thread" is redundant, and misses the extent to which all these series of posts are spun together from many threads--so, "yarn"?). But I'll note that this is an emendation.
And now that I'm OS X-active, I'll have to learn some Unix myself. . . .