BURNINGBIRD
a node at the edge  


August 23, 2002
EnvironmentHow Green is my Valley

The housing complex that I live in is quite large, with small buildings consisting of a combination of townhomes and flats. One of the nicest aspects of the place is all the trees and plants and green areas, including our fair share of critters--raccoons, opossum, rabbits, birds, teenagers.

This week, the complex started tearing up some of the green space, and in particular, taking down some trees in order to add parking spaces. It almost broke my heart yesterday to drive by a 20 foot tree, killed to make way for someone's Toyota or Ford Explorer. What is essentially meaningless about all of this is that there is enough parking, but people have to park 2 or 3 blocks away from their apartments.

In essence, the green was torn up because of convenience, not necessity. And next they're looking at my block. (In case you're wondering, I park close to three blocks away and walk, willingly, to and from my car. No fears about being mugged--the complex is home to one of St. Louis' unique neighborhood police outlets.)

Today I read in CNN that President Bush wants to prevent forest fires such as the ones that are consuming miles of forest in Oregon and northern California--forests I have walked. Bush's plan is to ease restrictions on timber companies, allowing them to enter a forest and "thin" it to prevent additional fires. And as a side benefit to the whole thing, think of all the boardfeet of lumber this will add to the market, more fuel for a sad, sad economy, and needed money to support forestry efforts.

In reality, removing Bush-colored glasses, this plan would give the forestry industry leave to police its own actions in regards to what it considers "thinning". It would be giving the timber industry the ability to determine how forests are managed, comparable to giving the airline industry the right to control the agency that regulates the airline industry. Oh. Wait a sec...

I grew up in a town in a town called Kettle Falls, in the Northeastern corner of Washington state. The community's economy was based on logging, and the timber industry still has a strong presence in the area. I've also walked miles and miles of clearcut, seeing huge bald patches of forest carefully hidden behind hills so that motorists can't see what's happened. They see mile after mile of tree and think, "Well, hey. What's the problem? Plenty of trees."

I've seen streams and the associated fishing destroyed by runoff. I've also seen homes literally buried in mud, and towns wiped off the map as the hills above them slowly and surely pushed the town out of existense. No trees to provide root systems to provide stability to the earth to provide a base for undergrowth to provide a drainage system to keep the land from literally slip, slidin, away.

These clearcuts are evidence of the timber companies good forestry management skills.

To prevent forest fires (as Smokey would say), you need to clear the scrub brush, the small trees, and the sick trees. Timber companies, though, don't want these. They want the big, healthy trees, the ones that provide the wood they can sell. After all, they are in business to make money. And make no mistake about it, the forest industry is no different then the oil industry in that both will sell out the environment to add profit to the bottom line. I know, I've worked for both: Sierra Geophysics, a Halliburton subsidiary (oil), and Weyerhaeuser (wood products and forest).

(What can I say? I've been around in my professional career.)

Some people will say that we want to cut the big trees to prevent the fire leaping from crown to crown, which is what can create a devastating blaze. True, this type of fire spread is the worst; however, the fire wouldn't get to the crowns of these big trees if the scrub and the small and sick trees were gone, as happens with lightning-caused fires and controlled burns.

Mr. President, give us a little credit, okay? Do you really think we're going to accept your plan at face value? Sorry, can't wrap this one up under cover of the War on Terror, and therefore not to be questioned.

In the virtual neighborhood (where trees grow without threat of blade, the air is always clear, and rain and sunshine fall in appropriate measure), Loren's also been reading the same news I have, but is somewhat heartened by Time Magazine's Green Century edition, which focuses entirely on the environment. This edition comes about because of the upcoming 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Will our man in SA, Mike Golby provide coverage?).

My favorite passage from the Time articles so far is:

    For starters, let's be clear about what we mean by "saving the earth." The globe doesn't need to be saved by us, and we couldn't kill it if we tried. What we do need to save—and what we have done a fair job of bollixing up so far—is the earth as we like it, with its climate, air, water and biomass all in that destructible balance that best supports life as we have come to know it. Muck that up, and the planet will simply shake us off, as it's shaken off countless species before us. In the end, then, it's us we're trying to save—and while the job is doable, it won't be easy.

Right on. Focus the problem on us and maybe people will pay attention. Bloody smart move.

It was good to read a major publication focusing entirely on the environment (and thanks to Loren for pointing this bit of bright news out as well as the funny Green Awards), but this ray of hope is tempered by the fact that our beloved president has decided not to attend the Summit. I believe he's currently on another vacation at his home in Texas, plotting more details of the War on Terror, and trying to figure out how to create yet more confusion about whether we/won't we invade Iraq. As our delegate, he's sending Colin Powell, the man most consistently out of step with, and ignored by, the President and the rest of the administration.

Sigh.

Still, I have my tree in the corner near my place, a real beauty. And I don't think there's any corporate concern that wants it...yet. And if they do, you'll know where I'll be--chained to the tree while accessing my weblog through wi-fi and documenting the story for you all as it unfolds.



Posted by Bb at August 23, 2002 12:49 PM




Comments

You're highlight from the Time article was more than relevant. As, I think, Chief Seattle said (and I may be paraphrasing): "What we do to the Earth we do to oursleves".

Posted by: Richard on August 23, 2002 02:58 PM

You young folks always get there first, BB.

I'm still thinking about this and won't have much to say for a couple of days, but I agree with virtually everything you've said here.

I try to keep hope up because I think too many people get turned off by constant bad news and simply ignore the problem, but I, too, have trouble staying positive.

I'm with you in trying to get people out to vote so we can at least attempt to ameliorate the problems .

Posted by: Loren on August 23, 2002 03:02 PM

Richard, Chief Seattle was one of my most admired people.

Loren, man, I adore you for that "You young people always get their first" comment. And agree with you on the vote. There's no reason not to be well informed before voting in this country, not with what we can find on the internet. And it's a start, right?

I hope I don't bore the international members of the virtual neighborhood, though I think they'll understand, and agree that a focus on political issues is important before a vote.

Posted by: Shelley aka Bb on August 23, 2002 03:41 PM

Someone should keep a running tally of idiot (well maybe not if your're in the logging industry) decisions such as these.

Posted by: Karl on August 23, 2002 04:04 PM

Damned right it's important and, as the Summit gets under way and 65,000 people troop into Jo'burg trailing tons of jet fuel and car fumes behind them, may I welcome them to South Africa and wish them a safe stay and a summit that turns out to be something more than the ubiquitous talk shops we're turning into an industry over here.

Many come with high hopes to leave having had them dashed by vested interests and crude agendas foisted on them by those with clout. Whether Powell's ignored back home or not, at least arguments and facts highlighting our need to clean up the mess we've created might reach sympathetic ears among federal officials in the U.S. delegation. I know many U.S. delegates are pushing extremely hard for change in key areas.

Fo rmy part, I laughed harshly at Bush's comment and moved on. It's the sort of dumb statement for which history will remember him. But the wisdom of stopping and questioning his credentials and his 'sincerity' on such an elementary issue is, I think, necessary and I'm pleased it's being done. I've seen this country strip-mined of timber by the likes of SAPPI which, when it was faced with an uncertain future, poured its money offshore to become one of the States's largest [if not the largest] paper producers.

I'm going to swallow and digest that Time article. In my exchange with Frank, I stated my belief that our kids will come to learn of all these things, good and bad, and that - in itself - is a good thing. As it is up to us to survive ourselves, so it will be up to them to control human problems. I wholeheartedly agree that while we might have given the globe a rash, it will brush us off like flies if we go too far. It will find new ways to flourish [if we don't turn it to glass first].

An issue related to that of turning out the vote. I was five or six when Kennedy was shot but still remember the mood that hit adults about me like a hammer. While we 'furriners' give the Bush and other administrations a hard time, perhaps it's felt in the States because we're vocally, abrasively aggressive. I believe the aggression arises in part from the doom and gloom that affects most of us come election time in the States. We equate not voting with not caring and, when the people of the most powerful and potentially most destructive [or constructive] nation in the world appear not to give a damn, it leads to a depression tinged with bitter resentment, a feeling of "They have it too good to care".

Beyond caring who is elected, I'd be a damned side more hopeful that we can pull back from a more ghastly, more tragic mess if I see Americans pouring to the polls in the coming two years.

Johannesburg, on the highveld [about 6,000 feet above sea level, is dry in winter. A featureless sprawl across the dry face of South Africa it is an ugly, raw, and brutal city [say what you want to, you who come from Gauteng, you know I'm right].

I hope many delegates get the chance to visit other parts of this amazingly beautiful country. Cape Town would be a good start and a bloody good example of a corner of the world worth saving. The Cape Peninsula's home to the smallest but most diverse floral kingdom in the world, boasting some 7,500-8,000 flower species not found elsewhere. And it's being tampled underfoot or 'developed' as more people flood into the Western Cape.

These are two cities among thousands. There's a dire need to force these issues come election time in every country in which we have a meaningful vote.

Go for it and thanks. I'll do something about giving my perspective of the summit from a thousand miles away. The news won't be sanitized before it reaches our ears and eyes.

Are you old, Loren? Funny; I had you pegged at about my age. I wonder why :)?

Posted by: Mike Golby on August 23, 2002 06:24 PM

Good post, Bb. Coming from a logging town myself (In BC) I can relate to your experiences in your home town.

S'funny how you never hear (especially in logging towns) how forest fires actually enrich the soil, help the growth of new forests, kill off insect infestations, etc.
(from here)

Posted by: bearman on August 23, 2002 08:17 PM

I imagine you can, Bearman.

It's funny but I called my Mom tonight and we spent two hours talking about home. This all is bringing back a lot of memories.

Mike, I think we will see a decent turnout this year. There's been so much going on that I think (hope) people will want to have some control in what's happening.

Cape Town sounds incredibly beautiful. I would love it visit it. I would love to visit Sydney. Hell, at this point, I would love to visit Kettle Falls -- need to travel!

Posted by: Shelley aka Bb on August 23, 2002 11:16 PM

Karl, I think we'll all need to keep our own personal scoreboards. Better yet -- weblog posts.

Posted by: Shelley aka Bb on August 23, 2002 11:16 PM

Bearman, I guess it takes one to know one... or something like that. We've seen some devastating fires around Cape Town and its water catchment areas in the past few decades, because of rapid urbanisation and an historical factor. Our planners and developers in years gone by used imported acacia, pines and bluegums for everything from timber to stabilising land. The fynbos kingdom, which sees a lot of fire as it is, benefits from and regenerates because of it - as you point out.

However, over past decades, the alien vegetation, which burns at a far greater heat, not only kills the fynbos seeds but grows back faster, preventing the regeneration of natural vegetation. Each pine sucks up to 200 liters of water a day. Incidentally, the Table Mountain chain overlooking the city, was so wrecked by fire a few years back that Cahpman's Peak drive, one of the most scenic in the area, had to be closed down [parts of it still are] as the earth became destabilised and several people were killed by falling rocks. It's three years down the line and, while much of it has been reopened, people living the other side of the mountain have to travel a longer route to the city, adding to traffic bottlenecks and wear and tear on the roads. Everything affects something else.

When Kader Asmal became Minister of Forestry and Water Affairs in '94, a 'lowly' cabinet post, he turned the eradication of alien vegetation into something of a national priority and gave the ministry the profile it deserved. His work is now being carried on by Ronnie Kassrils. At one time, about 5 years ago, it was estimated that about 85% of Cape Town's water suppply was threatened by the proliferation of alien vegetation.

Government has screwed up in many respects in South Africa, but you'll find many of the old lefties focussing on key areas which, although they don't bring short-term gain, stand to benefit us in the long run. By doing so, they draw attention to these issues and begin to educate the public - who vote them back in.

Good things need to be done. They can be as well.

Shelley, Cape Town is not Africa in many ways. But I was brushing my teeth this morning and several guys passed by our wall on their way to work at the racecourse or the local nursery. For some reason, they were in high spirits and broke into song. I've heard Sydney's a clean and beautiful city, but I doubt you would wake up there to an impromptu performance by a bunch of ordinary workers giving life to the sort of rhythms and harmonies made popular internationally by groups such as Ladysmith Black Mambazo. It's more than a music - it's an archetypal evocation of the spirit of a land before time, a celebration of something that lies in the structure of the rock of the world. It's deeper and more rhythmic than anything I've ever experienced in any other type of music, sounding as though it comes from chests much broader and more resonant than the norm. It's the spirit that hold this weird continent together. And it makes Cape Town an intrinsic part of Africa. Made me fell bloody good to be a part of it - brushing my teeth, this morning.

Posted by: Mike Golby on August 24, 2002 03:38 PM

The WSSD blog is here:
http://www.dailysummit.net/

Posted by: FARRAGO on August 25, 2002 01:19 PM

Hi, yeah, I was curious about Bush's logging plan. I didn't know how much was already being done about removing lower-lying, erm, plant life to help prevent forest fires, along with a controlled burn before summer kicks in.

But I'm just talking out of my arse, I'm an urban girl who's not spent much time in the woods, let alone had personal experience with the real effects of deforestation.

Posted by: andrea on August 25, 2002 09:59 PM

Give Bush a few years, Andrea -- you'll be able to see deforestation up close and personal every time you drive through a forest near your home.

Posted by: Shelley aka Bb on August 26, 2002 05:46 AM

Mike Golby's comments stir feelings in me, an exiled and homesick Capetonian (sounds like you live in Kenilworth, Mike, close to where we stayed with our daughter last summer). I was also going to comment on the fact of having the summit in Jo'burg in the winter months, when it is leafless and the ground is burnt brown by frost and veld-fires, the air is dry and dusty and thin, burns your nasal passages, and it takes a week or two to get acclimatized. Breeds fantastic hangovers too, and if you're prone to upper respiratory tract infections, you're going to get them there. All of which may help to explain the lack of positive impact which I'm sure will be the result of this show.

Posted by: Rob on August 26, 2002 11:55 AM


Post a comment

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?